Share
QR Code
April 23 03:45
flag image
  • Taylor
  • Griffin
  • Stop Jail
/editorial/recurring/teachersdeskmasthead.gif
shadow

Teacher's Desk


N. C. Lottery: A failed experiment



shadow
September 20, 2011
Good academic researchers have known for a long time that the best research is that which shows what you thought you already knew was correct. (And for the nerds among us, that concept is the origin of the 'null hypothesis).

Well, we have one such study released last week by the N. C. Justice Center. It is entitled A FAILED EXPERIMENT:

How the Lottery Has Not Helped Fund

North Carolina's Schools.


It is my sense that many people just accepted that, in 2005 when the "Education Lottery" passed the General Assembly by one vote that it would, if it produced the revenue they were projecting, solve the schools money problems. Just the opposite has turned out to be the case.

The reason? In a word: Supplanting.

Supplanting is a concept in government finance which essentially is the same thing my parents did to me when I got my first job. They cut off my allowance.

Yep, I had more money, but I did not have as much as if they had continued to give me as much as they had been giving me before I got a part-time job.

That is what the General Assembly has done with the lottery money. They gave it to the schools, pretty much as they said they would do, until last year when they changed to formulae a bit but what that does not account for is the fact that the power brokers did not continue to fund the schools from other sources as much as they had been doing before the lottery was enacted. They used lottery money to supplant what they had been giving the schools.

When it all washes out we suspect we will learn that the politicians also have done the same thing with the Federal Stimulus money that went to the schools. Because the budget makers knew that more Federal dollars were available they made less state and local dollars available than would otherwise be the case.

The other side of that coin is that in most cases the amount of money the schools are spending per pupil is more than the previous year, no matter what year you choose.

The Justice Center has also published a report on this phenomenon and you can read it by clicking here. Now what this study does not reflect is another fact that has become a trend in North Carolina. It is that as good economic times produce more spending on education, the percentage going to non-classroom regular positions tends to increase faster than the amount being spent in the classroom (teacher and assistants). Then when the cash cow runs dry it is the teaching and teacher assistant position that take the heavier cuts.

And one final observation. The Justice Center's report does not do a very good job of showing that the last session of the General Assembly used lottery resources to decrease class sizes in the lower grades without having to raise taxes. What that does not show is that there is very little research that shows that reducing class size by a couple of students results in significantly improved student performance.

But then, there is very little research that shows that spending more money in general improves student performance either. And there is absolutely no evidence that there is a proportionate relationship between increased spending and increased student performance.

So does spending matter? Of course it does. If it did not then we wouldn't debate it as much as we do.

printPrint
emailEmail
CommentComment
shareShare
  1. reply print email
    School funding
    September 22, 2011 | 07:31 AM

    The schools aren't the only place where the pols do this sleight of hand. It would seem that in a lot of instances they designate money from something to go to a specific cause (we can only assume that it was originally in order to gain support for whatever the "tax" was - just as was the lottery) Some folks spend a lot of time trying to keep track of the entitlement and the rest spend their time trying to figure a way around the self imposed restrictions. What a way to run a railroad. The entire charade could be avoided if only the pols demonstrated a little integrity.

    Kimo
  2. reply print email
    NC Lottery
    September 22, 2011 | 02:12 PM

    I moved here from a state that instituted an educational lottery with the promise that it would reduce property tax rates state wide. When the legislature saw how much money was pouring into the education coffers they decided to change the law and the lottery proceeds went into the general fund with only a percentage of that going to education. Property taxes returned to their higher amount. Anytime you allow someone else to control your money, your time or your property you are no longer a free man. In every case they will make their decisions based on what they deem proper not on what is best for you. Take heed in the upcoming elections.

    George H. Schryer
Reader Feedback Submission
Please do not use ALL CAPS or tabs.
* required value
Your Name*

Email (not shown on website)*

Subject*

Comment*


CLICK ON ANY AD
FOR MORE INFORMATION
Jones box
Site Search


Wednesday
04 - 23 - 14
03:45
Tayloe
beaufort mobile
PruittHealth
Lawson 1
Dixon
CARE
Keith jail
Stan 1

Copyright 2008-2013, Beaufort Observer Online, Inc. No part of this website may be used without permission