November 28 • 06:20
flag image
  • BPTea Party

Daily Haymaker

JLF: State spending continues to grow at an alarming rate

November 06, 2013
We've said it before, often, that "the more things change (in state government) the more they stay the same." Republicans were elected, for the most part, by voters who wanted reduction in government, and particularly the influence of special interests. That has not happened. The Republicans haven't done much better than the Democrats did is reducing government spending. Now a new report by the John Locke Foundation documents that fact. Brant Clifton, at the Daily Haymaker has the story:
Chris Fitzsimon, Bill Barber and the gang want us to believe that the GOP majority in Raleigh has cut state government to the bone. Thom Tillis — the state House speaker currently running for US Senate — tells us he's "North Carolina's Conservative Voice."

But a devastating new report from the folks at the John Locke Foundation illustrates that state spending — outside the general fund — has been growing by leaps and bounds before and during the conservative revolution:

North Carolina state government spending has grown "significantly" in recent decades, though much of that growth has been hidden beneath headlines that focus on the state's General Fund. That's a key finding from a new John Locke Foundation Spotlight report.
The report urges policymakers to focus on total state spending, which reached more than $51 billion, an average of $5,348 per person, in 2012. Since 1980, inflation-adjusted state spending has grown by more than 150 percent.

"Regardless of competing political platforms and campaign speeches about the state budget, one thing is clear: North Carolina's inflation-adjusted per-person budget expenditures increased significantly over the last 30 years," said report author Sarah Curry, JLF Director of Fiscal Policy Studies. "In particular, there have been rapid increases in state spending across all categories in the last 10 years. That's a dangerous precedent when one considers that the financial stability of state and federal governments is not at its strongest."

State government reached its highest General Fund appropriation in 2009, with an inflation-adjusted amount of $22.5 billion, Curry reports. "Since that time, General Fund spending has been slowly decreasing, but total state expenditures have increased, as more and more state spending moves outside the General Fund."

The shift away from the highly publicized General Fund has created a lack of transparency in North Carolina's budget process, Curry said. "Government budgets have a reputation for being difficult for the typical citizen to understand, and North Carolina is no exception," she said. "For many, the persistent growth in state spending is not easily visible because of the undue focus on the General Fund, particularly within the media."

Media reports often label North Carolina's General Fund as "the state budget." Curry's report explains that state spending also includes federal dollars, along with spending on non-General Fund items such as transportation and debt service.

"North Carolina has received about 45 percent of its total budget from the federal government over the past 10 years," Curry said. "The number was even higher in 2010 and 2011, when the so-called federal stimulus package boosted federal funding to a historic high of 56 percent of North Carolina's total budget."

State government officials should be "wary" of allowing such a large part of the state's expenditures to be dependent on federal funding, Curry said. "In reality, the federal government borrows all of this money before sending it to North Carolina state government," she said. "This funding source suffers from the same uncertainty that plagues all of Washington's deficit spending."

Because of the lack of transparency in state government spending, many people might not realize that the state spends more on health and human services than on education, Curry said. "Since 2005, during former Gov. Mike Easley's administration, the total HHS budget has been consistently higher than the total amount of funds spent on public education."

Within non-General Fund spending categories, North Carolina spent about $4.5 billion on transportation-related items in the most recent fiscal year, Curry said. "That expense has grown by 123 percent since 1980," she said. "In addition, the state's debt service spending was relatively stable until surges in 1997 and 2003. Debt service spending increased by 193 percent during this period."

Curry's report also calculates state government spending as a share of North Carolinians' personal income. "As recently as the mid-1980s, state government spending amounted to not much more than 9 percent of personal income," she said. "But that number has grown. Since the economy emerged from the Great Recession, state spending as a share of personal income has climbed sharply to an all-time high of 14 percent in 2012."

A focus on total state spending would help policymakers who are interested in improving North Carolina's economy, Curry said. "Total state spending is a more complete measure of the extent to which state government diverts real resources — land, labor, and capital — away from the private sector, where all economic growth is generated," she said. "This diversion, also known as 'crowding out,' leads to less economic growth and job creation. This is why our elected officials must begin the process of reducing the size of state government."
Curry's report also urges legislators and taxpayers to consider budget approaches designed to…
Click here to go to the original source to read the rest of the story.

  1. reply print email
    Can you read?
    November 07, 2013 | 08:19 AM

    I was just wondering if you were a product of NC public schools because you're reading comprehension level can't be very high.

    The report says spending has grown "over the past two decades." Last I check this current crop of Republicans didn't get elected until 3 years ago.

    Also, please tell me what you would like cut from government. Education is 60% of the budget. How many teachers would you like fired to cut spending?

    Medicaid is the next largest portion. Tell me how you cut spending on an entitlement program where 3/4s of it is federal spending.

    How many prisons do you want closed? How many roads do you not want paved or built?

    So yeah, try again. Go back and actually read things, if you can.


    Editor's response: Perhaps it is you who should re-read the article. You infer what was not said, or even implied. To say that state spending has grown greatly over the decade does not say it was caused by partisan control. What the article actually says is that it was driven more by Federal spending than anything else. Maybe now you know why Gov. McCrory refused to expand Medicaid, knowing that the Federal "enticement" (a.k.a know as a political bribe) would end in a year and the state would be stuck with funding it from then on.

    How to reduce spending. Simple. Pass a constitutional amendment that the state cannot spend more (without a vote of the people) than it did five years ago plus an adjustment for inflation (COL) and population change. Then cut every department by 5% per year until they got in line. You find out where the fat is.

    Note that we refrained from ridiculing your reading comprehension.

Reader Feedback Submission
Please do not use ALL CAPS or tabs.
* required value
Your Name*

Email (not shown on website)*



Venture rent
Site Search

Please consider supporting the Beaufort Observer with a donation to help defray expenses or to make a contribution to one of our columnists.

To designate a particular recipient of your donation please include or email instructions to: We appreciate your support.

11 - 28 - 15
beaufort mobile
Farm Bureau
Richardson PA
Arnolds 1-2014

Copyright 2008-2013, Beaufort Observer Online, Inc. No part of this website may be used without permission