Share
QR Code
July 24 10:51
flag image
  • jail insanity

Here're the gun control proposals being considered by the Obama Administration


January 14, 2013
We now know what and how they are planning to infringe on our right to keep and bear arms. The left-wing think tank, the Center for American Progress has made its report to the Obama Administration for what they call "Preventing Gun Violence in Our Nation." The Washington Post is reporting is reporting that the CAP will also lead the campaign to get the recommendation of the Biden group implemented.

The proposal is the most far-reaching effort in the nation's history to seek to restrict access to guns, control their manufacture and sell and track Americans who own guns. The proposal includes several executive actions that are proposed for implementation without getting Congressional approval.

The proposals would:

Ban what they call "military-grade" weapons. They define these as guns with magazines holding more than 10 rounds. The proposal is not only to stop the manufacture and sell of such weapons but to "take them off the streets and out of the hands of gun owners."

Create the most extensive data-base tracking system in the nation's history, not only of guns but of people who own guns. The proposal, if implemented, would allow the efficient confiscation of weapons and detention of people in the event of a "national emergency."

Centralizing the power to enforce gun laws in the Federal government and impose greater obligations on state and local officials to aid and abett the Federal enforcement of both existing and future gun control laws. In other words, it lays the groundwork for a massive enforcement mechanism.

More extensive background checks including the private sale of guns, including used guns.

Provides for ex parte orders for person accused, but never arrested or convicted of several misdemeanors (ex. harassment) based solely on a complaint by another individual without benefit of a trial for the person accused.

Give the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives more power, shield the agency from Congressional budget control and move it to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Click here to go to the original source.

The report does not include any research to support any of the recommendations based on whether they would actually be effective in reducing gun-related violence. In other words, there is no evidence that any of the proposals would actually work to accomplish what they suggest is the reason for the restrictions. There are no recommendations, except a proposal for harsher penalties, that are focused on prevening criminals for possessing any kind of weapon they choose to have or use. Most of the proposals would simply create more bureaucracy and penalize law abiding citizens while doing essentially nothing about criminals who already ignore the existing laws.

printPrint
emailEmail
CommentComment
shareShare
  1. reply print email
    Gun Control
    January 14, 2013 | 08:01 AM

    I think the problem lies not in the regulation of sale, but rather in the mental stability of those who are able to purchase such arms.

    David G
  2. reply print email
    who, what, & why
    January 14, 2013 | 03:37 PM

    Just WHO will make up the determination of mental stability? The DSM can change from year to year.

    "Military grade" as a term can include a bolt-action rifle to a totally non-working antique; rather than the most modern style of weapon.

    The use of "reporting and accusation of a crime may be used as a weapon in itself toward those totally innocent of said crime. Whatever happened to "innocent before PROVEN guilty"?

    Firearms are simply an object. They may be used in the same manner as any tool, chemical, or activity.
    The "problem" has shown itself to be world-wide (see Norway, etc). "Feel-good" vote getting legislation accomplishes little except to clog up appeals courts and not address the heart of the issue which may be VERY complex & need true study.

    John Grey
  3. reply print email
    How far will they go ?
    January 15, 2013 | 09:48 PM

    I can see background checks for used guns being ok but a criminal will sell another criminal a used gun no matter what they what laws are passed.I don't see what this achieves at all . Will this include Rimfire .22 too ? How about hi-power Air rifles ? you can get .357 air guns now .Will we need permits for air guns .

    Paul
  4. reply print email
    gun control
    January 17, 2013 | 04:45 PM

    I one must be pragmatic. one must make a law to control guns. Make the gun owner responsible for the guns safety. If the firearms owner is tried in court next to the killer as an accomplice the firearms owner will be more likely to use a trigger lock and to keep the guns in a proper gun safe when not in use as a hunting weapon or as a concealed arm. The first trial of this kind will make all gun holders conscious of their responsibility for our safety..

    R J Minuteman
Reader Feedback Submission
Please do not use ALL CAPS or tabs.
* required value
Your Name*

Email (not shown on website)*

Subject*

Comment*


CLICK ON ANY AD
FOR MORE INFORMATION
STJ  suit
Site Search


Thursday
07 - 24 - 14
10:51
Tayloe
beaufort mobile
PruittHealth
CARE
Arnolds 1-2014

Copyright 2008-2013, Beaufort Observer Online, Inc. No part of this website may be used without permission